
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
Ever since the signing of Roe vs Wade there has been people who’ve wanted to overturn it. In Red Clocks, Leni Zumas imagines just that. There has been no government takeover by an extreme Christo-conservative regime, merely the ‘Personhood Amendment’. Abortion is completely criminalised, IVF banned, a ‘Pink Wall’ stands between America and Canada to arrest women seeking such procedures under the charge of conspiracy to murder, and in fifteen days unmarried persons will be prohibited from adopting. In a small town in Oregon Red Clocks follows five women, young and old, living with old restrictions back in place.
In short, it bridges the gap between the now and The Handmaid’s Tale; the complacency that allowed such an amendment to be passed, the disregard of men who don’t understand or care about its effects, and how women continue to navigate being a person when their country may only see a womb, a red clock.
There is “The Wife” (Susan), mother to two and married to one thoroughly ungrateful husband. “The Daughter” (Mattie), a star student that finds herself pregnant with nowhere to turn. “The Mender” (Gin), an eccentric women living out in the woods with her goats and especial knowledge of plants and herbs that lands her on trial like she’s back in Salem with her ancestors. Then there is “The Biographer” (Ro) , a teacher, single, longing for a child her body can’t provide, and writing a biography of Eivør, a long dead polar explorer who had to fight her way to study science only to be silenced because no one would believe a woman had written about ice floes.
Each chapter is presented from the perspective of their titular character, at first I found this a little difficult to follow as names were not presented immediately but once settled in to the style it read as easily as any other book. Readers are able to piece the town together where the characters overlap, as expected of small towns everyone knows everyone else. It wasn’t lost on me either the parallel between characters and their titles. Susan and Mattie fit traditional gender roles and are defined by them, being a wife, being a daughter. Gin and Ro forge their lives outside of those expectations, whether by choice or circumstance, and are defined by their deeds. A risky narrative device, or little reminder that in a male-supremacist world a woman’s relation to a man trumps autonomy.
Red Clocks is a novel of ideas in that it takes the grain of criminalised abortion and reasons out the consequences from ripple to ripple. However, there’s also the underlining accusation of complacency, and sleep walking in to legislation because we left the decisions to someone else with an agenda. . How many times since 2016 have we heard the phrase “I never thought it would actually happen”? But it’s not all doom and gloom, there is humour (clap clap say the labia), and a realist description of women’s lives, even the grisly parts.
I want everyone to read this book. Especially the pro-lifers whose arguments never seem to go beyond carrying a pregnancy to term, though I feel Red Clocks will end up preaching to the converted. This book is important because of the ways in which it differs from The Handmaid’s Tale. It’s not set in a radical dystopia which could be written off as “oh just fictional”, the only difference between the world of Red Clocks and our own is the Personhood Amendment. It addresses the affect such legislation would have on us alive right now, not imagined women in a far future. Like the official summary says, it’s frighteningly plausible.
Full disclosure: I was provided a free ebook copy from the publisher through NetGalley in exchange for a review. The opinions are all my own.
